dreadvan
.::XHF Competitor::.
Posts: 136
|
Post by dreadvan on Jun 26, 2019 23:34:30 GMT -5
Well like I posted earlier, a global, promised match is far different than finding the next guy for a 30 day scheduled defense. The feds all have to compete by global rules as is to win one of those belts. Which should be the default ruleset should a fed vs fed contest happen. At worst case in lets say DW, during its reign, someone who doesn't roleplay well gets the belt and simply loses it next global contest. These global events happen a bit more often than some people seem to think as well, and of course, we can't forget there is an admin staff looking over them for stuff like fairness. They can and should make the final decision what to do with their straps should a fringe case arise.
|
|
|
Post by Mav. on Jun 27, 2019 15:40:21 GMT -5
I know I told you this in DMs but I will gladly take the Tag Czar role, I always cared about the Tag Division for about a year now and I'm not having it fall to shit over a disagreement. As I've told you before, Mongo, an agreement we might come to is this... Teams can come and earn points. After the end of the month, the team with the most points can challenge. If there's a team tied with points, they can battle it out to become the next challengers and if there's a Global Show coming up, that rule will not be applied and there will be a Multi-Man Tag Match. I don't want this division to die, but if it comes down to it... Then it must. I still go by this. Just saying.
|
|
Kira Izumi
J-ROK Staff
XHF's Resident Weeb
Posts: 5,918
|
Post by Kira Izumi on Jun 27, 2019 16:15:01 GMT -5
i still like the end of the month and team with the most points can get a shot thing you proposed mav.
|
|
|
Post by Mongo the Destroyer on Jun 27, 2019 18:06:34 GMT -5
I like that SWAT has 4 teams that qualify.
On that note, DT and I are thinking we do the tag title match on Overheated. This keeps guys from getting double booked and puts more focus on the titles
|
|
Kira Izumi
J-ROK Staff
XHF's Resident Weeb
Posts: 5,918
|
Post by Kira Izumi on Jun 27, 2019 18:10:59 GMT -5
that'll make overheated well... matter more and stuff too. sorry if that came out wrong, i don't know how to word it better than that.
|
|
|
Post by edwarddubin0604 on Jun 27, 2019 19:34:07 GMT -5
I agree and hat's a good idea to do so. Can I add a thought or two. What if events are scheduled in the champion's fed and there's a scheduled title defense in another fed. How will that be resolved since you can't alter the card and the next team in contention will complain along with the others. Just asking.
|
|
|
Post by Mongo the Destroyer on Jun 27, 2019 19:43:53 GMT -5
It depends, are you thinking two title matches or a defense and a non-title match? Because the second one wouldn't be an issue at all. I guess the safe thing would be to schedule 1 defense at a time, lol
|
|
|
Post by Dave D-Flipz on Jun 27, 2019 20:12:50 GMT -5
I think you default to more points and also first come first serve, make the challenge first you get first crack ... or a multi team match.
|
|
|
Post by edwarddubin0604 on Jun 27, 2019 20:42:06 GMT -5
What I meant was two title matches were scheduled at once by mistake. One of Dave's suggestions makes a bit of sense.
|
|
|
Post by Dave D-Flipz on Jun 27, 2019 21:44:42 GMT -5
So I'm leaving tomorrow. So until we decide on a new tag ... person ... send all points for tag teams to Mongo or Kanyon to add to the point tracker. I will be back Tuesday the 8th. The tag match on SWAT's current Battleground 13 has already been added since it was posted by the time I did the list. Pandemonium from RSW has not.
|
|
|
Post by Bobby Barratt on Jun 28, 2019 1:03:23 GMT -5
What I meant was two title matches were scheduled at once by mistake. One of Dave's suggestions makes a bit of sense. Personally I feel the tag teams should book their own defences to stop this. Pick the team and let whichever fed will host the match know. Done.
|
|
|
Post by "The Family Man" Danny Ray on Jun 28, 2019 16:46:11 GMT -5
Personally, I feel that the challenging team should hold the match in their fed since the tag belts are global and should move about the fed. Unless the challenging team wants to hold the match in another fed but ultimately the challenging team should get the choice of location.
|
|
|
Post by Mongo the Destroyer on Jun 28, 2019 17:40:20 GMT -5
Personally, I feel that the challenging team should hold the match in their fed since the tag belts are global and should move about the fed. Unless the challenging team wants to hold the match in another fed but ultimately the challenging team should get the choice of location. I disagree Duke. The tag titles themselves aren't the only thing that's global- and I think this is something people are having trouble conceptualizing: The Global Tag Division is global. That is, if feds are willing to book/write the match a tag match can take place in any fed with any teams. So a team isn't waiting around to become global through the titles, they're already global as soon as they register. Furthermore, I'd almost favor "champions advantage" and let title matches be at the champ's home fed rather than the challenger's. But it'd have the same problem forcing the matches to be only at the challenging fed, which is that the rules are different everywhere. Rather, unless a title match is between members of the same fed, it would behoove the champs/challengers/bookers to figure out a place everyone can agree to probably with the most "normal" rules. Either way, this topic has run its course. SWAT, rouse up your team (Chianti) and tell them that at least they have a title shot. Probably for Overheated would be best for everyone. And hey, who knows, maybe the champs want something messier and would like some of those other SWAT teams to register before then. Anyway, thank you guys, LOCKED
|
|